Subject: my comments and a question (was RE:enough already)
Date: Fri, 20 May 1994 09:24:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ed Totman <etotman@gort.ucsd.edu>

On Thu, 19 May 1994, Michael Halleen wrote:

<stuff deleted>
> I've yelled myself into a corner I never intended to go.  All I want is
> information.  So far no one has come forward to admit they use Imagine in
> a high level situation.  That's all I wanted to know.  That doesn't mean I
> hate art or students, God no.  I love that software like Imagine is
> available to so many people.

There have been several posts in the past from people who use Imagine to
make money, including me.  I'm sure there are others who are just lurking
or not connected to the net.  If making money is not considered a 'high
level situation', well I'm using it to create instructional videos here at
UCSD.  Imagine is a powerful program in the hands of a user who's willing
(or able) to devote lots of time.  Sure there are other programs that are
more productive, faster, or more efficient, but they generally cost a lot
more.  IMHO, Imagine is worth the money I paid, especially now that 3.0 is
here. 

Ramble mode <OFF>

Now, I know there was an extended discussion several months ago on field 
rendering, but the messages centered on Amiga tools to create the 
frames.  Anybody have suggestions as to which PC tools I could use?  
Impulse has not said when it would be incorporated, and frame animations 
look too jerky and unprofessional.

All suggestions appreciated...

Ed Totman
etotman@gort.ucsd.edu





                           -=> RETURN TO CONTENTS!<=-